Use Case

Development Consent Orders

Every Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project in England and Wales needs a Development Consent Order. The process is logical and well-defined, yet it routinely defeats projects that lack the discipline to manage their deliverables and validate submissions internally first. Project:OS carries a DCO from application to determination without losing the thread.

Project boundaries

The consented (or proposed) red-line boundary of every project in the corpus, drawn from the examination geospatial submissions and coloured by infrastructure sector. Hover a boundary for the project and case reference.

DCO Document Graph

Every UK Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project document, downloaded, standardised into a 54-category taxonomy and modelled as a knowledge graph across projects, organisations, document types and examination stages.
Documents
154,723
nodes with url, title, date
Projects
179
of 268
Organisations
17,108
submitters & applicants
Document types
54
standardised taxonomy
Classified
89.8%
high confidence
Filtered view: 83 projects are excluded, having been decided or withdrawn before 2018, holding fewer than five documents, or being minimal legacy records (Tilbury2, A19/A184 Testos Junction, Silvertown Tunnel, Millbrook Power). Excluded projects account for 2,083 of 154,723 documents. Time axes start at May 2018, the earliest application in the filtered set.
Every application SIZED BY DOCUMENT COUNT
Each dot is one DCO application, positioned by submission date and document count (log scale) and coloured by sector. Applications with fewer than 100 documents are not shown. Hover a dot for details.
Time to decision APPLICATION → DECISION, BY SECTOR
Each dot is a decided project; the diamond marks the sector median.
Standardised document types THE CLASSIFICATION RESULT
107,000 unique free-text labels → 54 categories via LLM classification.
TOP 16 OF 54 DOCUMENT TYPES154,723 docs
Environmental Statement (ES)27,767
Plans and Drawings18,405
Other / Unclassified16,237
Response to ExA Written Questions9,140
Response to SoS Consultation8,243
Comments on Submissions7,936
Statement of Common Ground (SoCG)7,301
Additional Submission7,224
Procedural Deadline Submission6,631
Post-Hearing Submission4,983
Application Form & Supporting Docs3,655
Development Consent Order (DCO)3,291
Written Representation (WR)3,137
Consultation Report2,432
Hearing Recording2,431
Hearing Transcript2,330
CLASSIFICATION CONFIDENCE
High confidence89.8%
Medium confidence4.1%
Low confidence6.1%

138,877 documents classified at high confidence, using gemini-2.5-flash-lite via OpenRouter.

DOCUMENTS BY APPLICATION SECTOR
EN01 · Generating Stations81,71195 proj
TR01 · Highways33,74530 proj
EN02 · Electric Lines12,76221 proj
TR02 · Airports8,0434 proj
TR05 · Rail Freight Interchanges5,2255 proj
EN07 · Other Pipe-lines4,7267 proj
TR03 · Harbour Facilities2,1593 proj
Documents by region ENGLISH REGIONS & WALES
Document volume by region. The East of England has the highest volume, driven by offshore wind, solar and Sizewell C. London has the lowest.
Network intelligence CROSS-PROJECT QUERIES
MOST SIMILAR PROJECTSshared organisations
Project pairShared
East Anglia ONE North ↔ East Anglia TWO offshore wind528
West Burton Solar ↔ Cottam Solar solar belt104
Gate Burton Energy Park ↔ Cottam Solar99
Norfolk Vanguard ↔ Norfolk Boreas77
Sizewell C ↔ East Anglia TWO76
ORG PAIRS WORKING TOGETHERshared projects
Organisation pairProjects
Natural England & Environment Agency core trio120
Historic England & Natural England110
Historic England & Environment Agency109
Natural England & Planning Inspectorate64
Environment Agency & Planning Inspectorate62
Programme-wide players DEGREE CENTRALITY
ORGS IN THE MOST PROJECTS
OrganisationProjects
Natural England134
Environment Agency123
Historic England116
The Planning Inspectorate98
National Highways68
BIGGEST PROJECTS BY VOLUME
ProjectDocs
Lower Thames Crossing7,863
The Sizewell C Project4,423
East Anglia TWO Offshore Windfarm3,782
East Anglia ONE North Windfarm3,758
Outer Dowsing Offshore Wind3,486
Examination lifecycle CORPUS COMPOSITION BY STAGE
StageDocumentsDominant document types
Examination94,302Environmental Statement · Plans · ExQ responses
Developer's application31,233Environmental Statement · Plans · Consultation Report
Decision12,013SoS Consultation · Post-Decision · Decision Letter
Pre-examination9,913Additional Submission · Procedural Deadline · Plans
Post-decision2,228Non-Material Change · Correction Order · DCO
Pre-application2,081Scoping Report · s46 Notification · Environmental Statement

Timelines

Every dated DCO document on a timeline. Filter by sector or drill into a single project.
Cumulative documents RUNNING TOTAL
Running total of every dated document in the filtered register.
Submission activity MONTHLY · FILTERABLE
Monthly volume by calendar HEATMAP
Monthly document volume by year and calendar month. Submissions cluster around examination deadlines.
Programme pipeline APPLICATION → DECISION
Each bar is a project's journey from application to decision. The 6-month statutory examination window is the darker segment.
Examination activity profile ALIGNED ON EXAMINATION START
Projects aligned on the month their examination opened, then averaged. Activity is low before the examination, peaks during the six-month window, and falls away after the close. The spike five to six months before opening is the application submission.
Document volume vs decision time DECIDED PROJECTS

Ready to Make Best Practice Executable?

Book a discovery call to see how Synaform and Project:OS can make governance and delivery work for your programme.